Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome. CONCLUSION: The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations. MAIN RESULTS: Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event. IMPLICATIONS FOR SERVICES: Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines. PERSPECTIVES: New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.

Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, a quality improvement project called "Adequate Childbirth Project" (PPA) was implemented in Brazilian private hospitals in order to reduce cesarean sections without clinical indication. The PPA is structured in four components, one of which is directed at women and families. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of PPA on women's preference for vaginal birth (VB) at the end of pregnancy. METHODS: Evaluative research conducted in 12 private hospitals participating in the PPA. Interviews were carried out in the immediate postpartum period and medical record data were collected at hospital discharge. The implementation of PPA activities and women's preference for type of birth at the beginning and end of pregnancy were compared in women assisted in the PPA model of care and in the standard of care model, using a chi-square statistical test. To estimate the effect of PPA on women's preference for VB at the end of pregnancy, multiple logistic regression was performed with selection of variables using a causal diagram. RESULTS: Four thousand seven hundred ninety-eight women were interviewed. The implementation of the planned activities of PPA was less than 50%, but were significantly more frequent among women assisted in the PPA model of care. Women in this group also showed a greater preference for VB at the beginning and end of pregnancy. The PPA showed an association with greater preference for VB at the end of pregnancy in primiparous (OR 2.54 95% CI 1.99-3.24) and multiparous women (OR 1.44 95% CI 0.97-2.12), although in multiparous this association was not significant. The main factor associated with the preference for VB at the end of pregnancy was the preference for this type of birth at the beginning of pregnancy, both in primiparous (OR 18.67 95% CI 14.22-24.50) and in multiparous women (OR 53.11 95% CI 37.31-75.60). CONCLUSIONS: The PPA had a positive effect on women's preference for VB at the end of pregnancy. It is plausible that more intense effects are observed with the expansion of the implementation of the planned activities. Special attention should be given to information on the benefits of VB in early pregnancy.

Cesarean rates have been increasing worldwide and constitute the most frequent type of childbirth in Brazil since 2009. In 2015, a quality improvement project was implemented in Brazilian private hospitals, with the objective of reducing medically unnecessary cesarean sections and increasing the number of vaginal births. This project, called "Adequate Childbirth Project" (PPA), has four components, one of which is directed at women and families, aiming to increase their participation in decision-making processes related to childbirth. In this study, we assessed whether this program contributed to increased preference for vaginal birth at the end of pregnancy. In previous studies in Brazil, we saw that women who maintained preference for vaginal birth throughout pregnancy were those who had the lowest proportion of cesarean sections. We found that the PPA increased preference for vaginal birth by almost three times in primiparous women. Among women with previous births, this increase was smaller. In this group of women, having a previous cesarean section was an important factor for not wanting a vaginal birth, and this is a very common condition in Brazil. For all women, having preference for vaginal birth at the beginning of pregnancy was the main factor in wanting this type of birth at the end of pregnancy. The results demonstrate the importance of educational activities that disseminate information about the benefits of vaginal birth, increasing the preference of women for this type of childbirth, in addition to supporting them throughout pregnancy, so that they feel empowered in their choice.

Maternal health surveillance panel: a tool for expanding epidemiological surveillance of women's health and its determinants.

OBJECTIVE: To present the methodology used in the development of two products for maternal health surveillance and its determinants and discuss their possible uses. METHODS: Based on a theoretical model of the determinants of maternal death and databases of Brazilian health information systems, two free products were developed: an interactive panel "surveillance of maternal health" and an educational material "Aparecida: a story about the vulnerability of Brazilian women to maternal death", both available on the website of the Brazilian Obstetric Observatory. RESULTS: More than 30 indicators were calculated for the period 2012-2020, containing information on socioeconomic conditions and access to health services, reproductive planning, prenatal care, delivery care, conditions of birth and maternal mortality and morbidity. The indicators related to severe maternal morbidity in public hospitalizations stand out, calculated for the first time for the country. The panel allows analysis by municipality or aggregated by health region, state, macro-region and country; historical series analysis; and comparisons across locations and with benchmarks. Information quality data are presented and discussed in an integrated manner with the indicators. In the educational material, visualizations with national and international data are presented, aiming to help in the understanding of the determinants of maternal death and facilitate the interpretation of the indicators. CONCLUSION: It is expected that the two products have the potential to expand epidemiological surveillance of maternal health and its determinants, contributing to the formulation of health policies and actions that promote women's health and reduce maternal mortality.

Maternal health surveillance panel: a tool for expanding epidemiological surveillance of women's health and its determinants / Painel de vigilância da saúde materna: uma ferramenta para ampliação da vigilância epidemiológica da saúde das mulheres e seus determinantes

ABSTRACT Objective: To present the methodology used in the development of two products for maternal health surveillance and its determinants and discuss their possible uses. Methods: Based on a theoretical model of the determinants of maternal death and databases of Brazilian health information systems, two free products were developed: an interactive panel "surveillance of maternal health" and an educational material "Aparecida: a story about the vulnerability of Brazilian women to maternal death", both available on the website of the Brazilian Obstetric Observatory. Results: More than 30 indicators were calculated for the period 2012-2020, containing information on socioeconomic conditions and access to health services, reproductive planning, prenatal care, delivery care, conditions of birth and maternal mortality and morbidity. The indicators related to severe maternal morbidity in public hospitalizations stand out, calculated for the first time for the country. The panel allows analysis by municipality or aggregated by health region, state, macro-region and country; historical series analysis; and comparisons across locations and with benchmarks. Information quality data are presented and discussed in an integrated manner with the indicators. In the educational material, visualizations with national and international data are presented, aiming to help in the understanding of the determinants of maternal death and facilitate the interpretation of the indicators. Conclusion: It is expected that the two products have the potential to expand epidemiological surveillance of maternal health and its determinants, contributing to the formulation of health policies and actions that promote women's health and reduce maternal mortality.

RESUME Objetivo: Apresentar a metodologia utilizada no desenvolvimento de dois produtos para a vigilância da saúde materna e seus determinantes e discutir as suas possíveis utilizações. Métodos: A partir de modelo teórico dos determinantes do óbito materno e bases de dados dos sistemas de informação em saúde brasileiros, foram desenvolvidos dois produtos gratuitos: um painel interativo denominado "Vigilância da saúde materna" e um material educativo chamado "Aparecida: uma história sobre a vulnerabilidade da mulher brasileira à morte materna", ambos disponíveis no site do Observatório Obstétrico Brasileiro. Resultados: Foram calculados mais de 30 indicadores para o período 2012-2020, contendo informações sobre condições socioeconômicas e de acesso a serviços de saúde, planejamento reprodutivo, assistência pré-natal, assistência ao parto, condições de nascimento e mortalidade e morbidade materna. Destacam-se os indicadores relacionados à morbidade materna grave em internações públicas, calculados pela primeira vez para o país. O painel permite análises por município ou agregadas por região de saúde, unidade da federação, macrorregião e país; análises de série histórica; e comparações entre localidades e com padrões de referência. Dados de qualidade da informação são apresentados e discutidos de forma integrada aos indicadores. No material educativo, visualizações com dados nacionais e internacionais são apresentadas, visando auxiliar na compreensão dos determinantes do óbito materno e facilitar a interpretação dos indicadores. Conclusão: Espera-se que os produtos tenham o potencial de ampliar a vigilância epidemiológica da saúde materna e seus determinantes, contribuindo para a formulação de políticas e ações de saúde que promovam a saúde das mulheres e reduzam a mortalidade materna.

PREPARE: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial to Evaluate Whether Risk Stratification Can Reduce Preterm Deliveries Among Patients With Suspected or Confirmed Preterm Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Early delivery in preterm preeclampsia may reduce the risks for the patient, but consequences of prematurity may be substantial for the baby. This trial evaluated whether the implementation of a risk stratification model could safely reduce prematurity. METHODS: This was a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in seven clusters. Patients presenting with suspected or confirmed preeclampsia between 20+0 and 36+6 gestational weeks were considered eligible. At the start of the trial, all centers were allocated in the preintervention phase, and patients enrolled in this phase were managed according to local treatment guidance. Subsequently, every 4 months, 1 randomly allocated cluster transitioned to the intervention. Patients enrolled in the intervention phase had sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1)/PlGF (placental growth factor) ratio and preeclampsia integrated estimate of risk assessments performed. If sFlt-1/PlGF ≤38 and preeclampsia integrated estimate of risk <10%, patients were considered low risk and clinicians received recommendations to defer delivery. If sFlt-1/PlGF >38 and preeclampsia integrated estimate of risk ≥10%, patients were considered not low risk, and clinicians received recommendations to increase surveillance. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with preterm preeclampsia delivered prematurely out of total deliveries. RESULTS: Between March 25, 2017 and December 24, 2019, 586 and 563 patients were analyzed in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively. The event rate was 1.09% in the intervention group, and 1.37% in the usual care group. After prespecified adjustments for variation between and within clusters over time, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.45 ([95% CI, 1.04-2.02]; P=0.029), indicating a higher risk of preterm deliveries in the intervention group. Post hoc analysis including calculation of risk differences did not show evidence of statistical differences. Abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF was associated with a higher rate of identifying preeclampsia with severe features. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an intervention based on biomarkers and clinical factors for risk stratification did not lead to reductions in preterm deliveries. Further training on the interpretation of disease severity in preeclampsia and the development of additional risk stratification is needed before adoption into clinical practice. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03073317.

Perinatal Health in Amazon Triple Border Region: Cross-Sectional Analysis Comparing Outcomes in the Brazilian, Peruvian and Colombian Population.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perinatal outcomes in Brazilian, Peruvian, and Colombian women in a Brazilian reference maternity hospital based at Amazon triple border region. METHOD: A cross-sectional case study of data from 3242 live birth certificates issued at the Tabatinga public maternity hospital, in the countryside of Amazonas, in the period between January 2015 and December 2017. Maternal and perinatal independent variables were analysed based on central tendency and variability, and frequency distribution for categorical variables. The Pearson's Chi-Square test and univariate analyses were performed to estimate probability ratios (Odds Ratio-OR). RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the education level in the three population groups, as well as in the number of previous pregnancies, antenatal consultations, month of initial prenatal care, and type of delivery. Brazilian pregnant women had more prenatal consultations, caesarean sections, and premature births. Peruvian and Colombian women started antenatal care later, and those with high-risk pregnancies tended to deliver in their home country. CONCLUSION FOR PRACTICE: Our findings show some singularities in the care of women and infants in the Amazonian triple border region. The Brazilian Unified Health Care System performs an important role in the guarantee of free access to health services, and ensures comprehensive care for women and infants, promoting human rights in border regions regardless of nationality.

Assessment of the completeness of filling the pregnant woman's card from the Ministry of Health: a national, cross-sectional study. / Avaliação da completitude de preenchimento do cartão da gestante do Ministério da Saúde: estudo seccional, de âmbito nacional.

This article aims to evaluate the completeness of the pregnant woman's card filling according to a model standardized by the Ministry of Health. Hospital based, nationwide, cross-sectional study conducted between 2011 and 2012, evaluated data from pregnant women's cards. Variables related to personal, obstetric history and current pregnancy data were used to assess completeness. We used the Kotelchuck index for quantitative evaluation. We analysed 6,577 cards, equivalent to 39% of the cards presented at the time of delivery. The mean completeness was overall "bad" in Brazil and macro-regions, except in the Southern region. Nationwide, the mean completion was "regular" for personal antecedents, "good" for obstetric history, and "bad" for fields related to the current pregnancy. Prenatal care was adequate for 58% of pregnant women. We observed a reduced use of the card recommended by the Ministry of Health and failures in the completeness of filling valuable information of the pregnant woman's card, related to the current pregnancy.

O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar a completitude de preenchimento do cartão da gestante segundo modelo padronizado pelo Ministério da Saúde. Estudo seccional de âmbito nacional, base hospitalar, realizado entre 2011 e 2012, que avaliou dados de cartões da gestante. Para avaliação da completitude sob aspecto qualitativo foram utilizadas variáveis relativas a antecedentes pessoais, obstétricos e dados da gestação atual. Para avaliação sob aspecto quantitativo foi utilizado o índice de Kotelchuck. Analisados 6.577 cartões, correspondendo a 39% dos cartões apresentados no momento do parto. A média de completitude foi "ruim" no Brasil e macrorregiões, exceto na região Sul. No Brasil, a média de preenchimento foi "regular" para os antecedentes pessoais, "bom" nos antecedentes obstétricos, e "ruim" nos campos referentes à gestação atual. A assistência pré-natal foi adequada à 58% das gestantes. Foi observada reduzida utilização do modelo de cartão preconizado pelo Ministério da Saúde e falhas no preenchimento do cartão da gestante de informações importantes, relacionadas principalmente à gestação atual.

Avaliação da completitude de preenchimento do cartão da gestante do Ministério da Saúde: estudo seccional, de âmbito nacional / Assessment of the completeness of filling the pregnant woman's card from the Ministry of Health: a national, cross-sectional study

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar a completitude de preenchimento do cartão da gestante segundo modelo padronizado pelo Ministério da Saúde. Estudo seccional de âmbito nacional, base hospitalar, realizado entre 2011 e 2012, que avaliou dados de cartões da gestante. Para avaliação da completitude sob aspecto qualitativo foram utilizadas variáveis relativas a antecedentes pessoais, obstétricos e dados da gestação atual. Para avaliação sob aspecto quantitativo foi utilizado o índice de Kotelchuck. Analisados 6.577 cartões, correspondendo a 39% dos cartões apresentados no momento do parto. A média de completitude foi "ruim" no Brasil e macrorregiões, exceto na região Sul. No Brasil, a média de preenchimento foi "regular" para os antecedentes pessoais, "bom" nos antecedentes obstétricos, e "ruim" nos campos referentes à gestação atual. A assistência pré-natal foi adequada à 58% das gestantes. Foi observada reduzida utilização do modelo de cartão preconizado pelo Ministério da Saúde e falhas no preenchimento do cartão da gestante de informações importantes, relacionadas principalmente à gestação atual.

Abstract This article aims to evaluate the completeness of the pregnant woman's card filling according to a model standardized by the Ministry of Health. Hospital based, nationwide, cross-sectional study conducted between 2011 and 2012, evaluated data from pregnant women's cards. Variables related to personal, obstetric history and current pregnancy data were used to assess completeness. We used the Kotelchuck index for quantitative evaluation. We analysed 6,577 cards, equivalent to 39% of the cards presented at the time of delivery. The mean completeness was overall "bad" in Brazil and macro-regions, except in the Southern region. Nationwide, the mean completion was "regular" for personal antecedents, "good" for obstetric history, and "bad" for fields related to the current pregnancy. Prenatal care was adequate for 58% of pregnant women. We observed a reduced use of the card recommended by the Ministry of Health and failures in the completeness of filling valuable information of the pregnant woman's card, related to the current pregnancy.

Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy (REBRACO: a multicentre study protocol).

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, epidemiological and laboratory aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and postpartum in 16 maternity hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre study, with five axes. First, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among women admitted for childbirth will be described in a cross-sectional study. Second, maternal and perinatal outcomes will be assessed in a prospective cohort study including pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19. Third, a cohort of positive COVID-19 cases with sampling of a variety of biological material. Histopathological and viral analysis of biological maternal and neonatal samples will be performed, and the assessment of nutritional variables to evaluate the association between vitamin D and severity of infection. Fourth, a monitoring and evaluation committee to collect relevant healthcare information and plan actions in centres facing the pandemic. Furthermore, qualitative studies will be performed to study pregnant women, their families and health professionals. Fifth, an ecological study will monitor the number of live births, stillbirths and other outcomes to explore any trend among the periods before, during and after the pandemic. Data will systematically be collected in an electronic platform following standardised operational procedures. For quantitative study components, an appropriate statistical approach will be used for each analysis. For qualitative data, in-depth interviews recorded in audio will be transcribed, checking the text obtained with the recording. Subsequently, thematic analysis with the aid of the NVivo programme will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (letters of approval numbers 4.047.168, 4.179.679 and 4.083.988). All women will be fully informed to sign the consent form before enrolment in the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

Nascer no Brasil: continuity of care during pregnancy and postpartum period for women and newborns.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the adequacy of health care during pregnancy and the postpartum period in puerperal women and newborn users of the Unified Health System and verify the factors associated with greater adequacy. METHODS: We used data obtained in the hospital interview, the prenatal card and the first telephone interview of 12,646 women participating in the study Nascer no Brasil (Birth in Brazil), conducted in 2011 and 2012. In the first stage of the analysis, the sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of women and the estimation of adequacy of prenatal and postpartum care indicators are described. In the second stage, the cascade of care for actions related to puerperal women and their newborns is presented. Finally, maternal factors associated with the adequacy of the line of care are verified by means of multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Only two of the four prenatal indicators were considered satisfactory: initiation up to the 16th week of pregnancy and adequate number of appointments. The guidance on which maternity to go for delivery, as well as the guidance to perform the puerperal appointment and the performance of the heel prick test have reached partial level of adequacy. The puerperal appointment, the first routine appointment of the newborn and the obtaining of the heel prick test results presented unsatisfactory adequacy. In the joint analysis of indicators regarding the effective use of services, only 1.5% of mothers and their babies received all recommended health care. Multiparous women living in the North, Northeast and Midwest, with lower schooling, presented the lowest chances of continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: The indicators evaluated indicate that almost all women and their children presented partial and disjointed care, showing that the coordination of care is still a challenge in the health care of women and children in the puerperal pregnancy period.

Risk stratification for small for gestational age for the Brazilian population: a secondary analysis of the Birth in Brazil study.

Risk-stratification screening for SGA has been proposed in high-income countries to prevent perinatal morbidity and mortality. There is paucity of data from middle-income settings. The aim of this study is to explore risk factors for SGA in Brazil and assess potential for risk stratification. This population-based study is a secondary analysis of Birth in Brazil study, conducted in 266 maternity units between 2011 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed, and population attributable fraction estimated for early and all pregnancy factors. We calculated absolute risk, odds ratio, and population prevalence of single or combined factors stratified by parity. Factors associated with SGA were maternal lupus (ORadj 4.36, 95% CI [2.32-8.18]), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (ORadj 2.72, 95% CI [2.28-3.24]), weight gain < 5 kg (ORadj 2.37, 95% CI [1.99-2.83]), smoking at late pregnancy (ORadj 2.04, 95% CI [1.60-2.59]), previous low birthweight (ORadj 2.22, 95% CI [1.79-2.75]), nulliparity (ORadj 1.81, 95% CI [1.60-2.05]), underweight (ORadj 1.61, 95% CI [1.36-1.92]) and socioeconomic status (SES) < 5th centile (ORadj 1.23, 95% CI [1.05-1.45]). Having two or more risk factors (prevalence of 4.4% and 8.0%) was associated with a 2 and fourfold increase in the risk for SGA in nulliparous and multiparous, respectively. Early and all pregnancy risk factors allow development of risk-stratification for SGA. Implementation of risk stratification coupled with specific strategies for reduction of risk and increased surveillance has the potential to contribute to the reduction of stillbirth in Brazil through increased detection of SGA, appropriate management and timely delivery.

[Use of outpatient health services by postpartum women and newborns: data from the Birth in Brazil study]. / Utilização de serviços de saúde ambulatoriais no pós-parto por puérperas e recém-nascidos: dados do estudo Nascer no Brasil.

This study aims to estimate postpartum use of outpatient health services and verify the demographic, socioeconomic, and obstetric factors associated with use. A nationwide hospital-based study in 2011-2012 interviewed 23,894 women. Point estimates and respective confidence intervals were calculated for eight indicators of health services use, with performance assessed as "satisfactory" (75%-100%); "partial" (50%-74%), or "unsatisfactory" (< 50%). Multiple logistic regression was performed to verify the association between women's characteristics and each target indicator. Four indicators ("visit to health service for postpartum follow-up" (73.9%; 95%CI: 72.4-75.3), "visit to health service for neonatal follow-up" (91.6%; 95%CI: 90.6-92.5), "BCG vaccination" (99%; 95%CI: 98.7-99.2), and "HBV vaccination" (96.8%; 95%CI: 96.0-97.5) were considered satisfactory. "Neonatal screening test in the first week of life" was considered partial (60.1%; 95%CI: 57.6-62.6), while "woman's consultation in the first 15 days postpartum" (37%; 95%CI: 35.0-39.0), "neonatal consultation in the first seven days of life" (21.8%; 95%CI: 20.2-23.5), and "neonatal screening test result in the first month of life" (29.8%; 95%CI: 27.6-32.2) were considered unsatisfactory. Regional and social inequalities were identified, with worse performance for all the indicators in the North and Northeast regions of Brazil and in more vulnerable women, revealing the need for better organization and supply of services to reduce iniquities.

Treatment dropout after pregnancy: a study of women living with HIV in Rio de Janeiro.

Despite the investment in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, there is still little data about the proportion of women that are retained in treatment after pregnancy in Brazil. Research worldwide shows that a significant proportion of women drop out of treatment after pregnancy. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with treatment dropout of women that received prenatal care at a federal hospital in Rio de Janeiro between 2016 and 2017 and abandoned treatment after pregnancy. This was a retrospective cohort study using data on prescription refills and hospital medical records. Cross-sectional analysis of data from 454 women showed that 18% were not on cART after pregnancy. Illicit drug use during pregnancy, being less than 35 years old, and being aware of HIV diagnosis before conceiving but not taking cART were factors associated with treatment interruption postpartum. The high prevalence of interruption of HIV treatment after pregnancy suggests that there is a need for better post-natal care to increase adherence in this population.

Nascer no Brasil: continuity of care during pregnancy and postpartum period for women and newborns / Nascer no Brasil: continuidade do cuidado na gestação e pós-parto à mulher e ao recém-nato

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the adequacy of health care during pregnancy and the postpartum period in puerperal women and newborn users of the Unified Health System and verify the factors associated with greater adequacy. METHODS We used data obtained in the hospital interview, the prenatal card and the first telephone interview of 12,646 women participating in the study Nascer no Brasil (Birth in Brazil), conducted in 2011 and 2012. In the first stage of the analysis, the sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of women and the estimation of adequacy of prenatal and postpartum care indicators are described. In the second stage, the cascade of care for actions related to puerperal women and their newborns is presented. Finally, maternal factors associated with the adequacy of the line of care are verified by means of multiple logistic regression. RESULTS Only two of the four prenatal indicators were considered satisfactory: initiation up to the 16th week of pregnancy and adequate number of appointments. The guidance on which maternity to go for delivery, as well as the guidance to perform the puerperal appointment and the performance of the heel prick test have reached partial level of adequacy. The puerperal appointment, the first routine appointment of the newborn and the obtaining of the heel prick test results presented unsatisfactory adequacy. In the joint analysis of indicators regarding the effective use of services, only 1.5% of mothers and their babies received all recommended health care. Multiparous women living in the North, Northeast and Midwest, with lower schooling, presented the lowest chances of continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS The indicators evaluated indicate that almost all women and their children presented partial and disjointed care, showing that the coordination of care is still a challenge in the health care of women and children in the puerperal pregnancy period.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Estimar a adequação da linha de cuidado da atenção à saúde durante a gestação e o pós-parto em puérperas e recém-natos usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde e verificar os fatores associados à maior adequação. MÉTODOS Foram utilizados os dados obtidos na entrevista hospitalar, no cartão de pré-natal e na primeira entrevista telefônica de 12.646 mulheres participantes do estudo Nascer no Brasil, realizado em 2011 e 2012. Na primeira etapa da análise, descrevem-se as características sociodemográficas e obstétricas das mulheres e a estimativa de adequação de indicadores de cuidado pré-natal e pós-parto. Na segunda etapa, apresenta-se a cascata de cuidados das ações relativas ao cuidado da mulher e do recém-nascido. Por último, verificam-se os fatores maternos associados à adequação da linha de cuidado, por meio de regressão logística múltipla. RESULTADOS Apenas dois dos quatro indicadores do pré-natal foram considerados satisfatórios: início até a 16ª semana de gestação e número adequado de consultas. Atingiram patamar parcial de adequação a orientação sobre qual maternidade procurar para ter o parto, a orientação para comparecer ao serviço de saúde para realizar a consulta de puerpério e a realização do teste do pezinho. A consulta de puerpério, a primeira consulta de rotina do recém-nascido e o recebimento do teste do pezinho apresentaram adequação insatisfatória. Na análise conjunta dos indicadores que dizem respeito à efetiva utilização dos serviços, apenas 1,5% das mães e seus bebês receberam todos os cuidados em saúde recomendados. Mulheres residentes no Norte, Nordeste e Centro-Oeste, com menor escolaridade e multíparas apresentaram as menores chances de continuidade do cuidado. CONCLUSÕES Os indicadores avaliados sinalizam que quase a totalidade das mulheres e seus filhos apresentaram uma assistência parcial e desarticulada, indicando que a coordenação do cuidado ainda é um desafio na atenção à saúde de mulheres e crianças no período gravídico puerperal.

Utilização de serviços de saúde ambulatoriais no pós-parto por puérperas e recém-nascidos: dados do estudo Nascer no Brasil / Use of outpatient health services by postpartum women and newborns: data from the Birth in Brazil study / Utilización de servicios de salud ambulatorios en el posparto por parte de puérperas y recién nacidos: datos del estudio Nacer en Brasil

Este trabalho tem por objetivo estimar a utilização de serviços de saúde ambulatoriais no pós-parto e verificar os fatores demográficos, socioeconômicos e obstétricos associados a este uso. Estudo nacional de base hospitalar, realizado em 2011-2012, com entrevistas de 23.894 mulheres. Foram calculadas as estimativas pontuais e os respectivos intervalos de confiança de oito indicadores de utilização de serviços de saúde com desempenho avaliado como "satisfatório" (75%-100%); "parcial" (50%-74%) e "insatisfatório" (< 50%). Foi realizada regressão logística múltipla para verificar a associação entre as características das mulheres e cada um dos indicadores analisados. Quatro indicadores - "procura de serviço para consulta de revisão do parto" (73,9%; IC95%: 72,4-75,3); "procura de serviço para consulta do recém-nato" (91,6%; IC95%: 90,6-92,5); "vacinação com BCG" (99%; IC95%: 98,7-99,2); e "vacinação contra hepatite B" (96,8%; IC95%: 96,0-97,5) foram considerados satisfatórios. A "coleta do teste de triagem neonatal na primeira semana de vida" foi considerada parcial (60,1%; IC95%: 57,6-62,6), e "consulta da mulher nos primeiros 15 dias após o parto" (37%; IC95%: 35,0-39,0), "consulta do recém-nato nos primeiros sete dias de vida" (21,8%; IC95%: 20,2-23,5) e "recebimento do resultado da triagem neonatal no primeiro mês de vida" (29,8%; IC95%: 27,6-32,2) foram considerados insatisfatórios. Desigualdades regionais e sociais foram identificadas, com o pior desempenho de todos os indicadores nas regiões Norte e Nordeste e em mulheres mais vulneráveis, apontando para a necessidade de uma melhor organização e oferta dos serviços visando à redução de iniquidades.

This study aims to estimate postpartum use of outpatient health services and verify the demographic, socioeconomic, and obstetric factors associated with use. A nationwide hospital-based study in 2011-2012 interviewed 23,894 women. Point estimates and respective confidence intervals were calculated for eight indicators of health services use, with performance assessed as "satisfactory" (75%-100%); "partial" (50%-74%), or "unsatisfactory" (< 50%). Multiple logistic regression was performed to verify the association between women's characteristics and each target indicator. Four indicators ("visit to health service for postpartum follow-up" (73.9%; 95%CI: 72.4-75.3), "visit to health service for neonatal follow-up" (91.6%; 95%CI: 90.6-92.5), "BCG vaccination" (99%; 95%CI: 98.7-99.2), and "HBV vaccination" (96.8%; 95%CI: 96.0-97.5) were considered satisfactory. "Neonatal screening test in the first week of life" was considered partial (60.1%; 95%CI: 57.6-62.6), while "woman's consultation in the first 15 days postpartum" (37%; 95%CI: 35.0-39.0), "neonatal consultation in the first seven days of life" (21.8%; 95%CI: 20.2-23.5), and "neonatal screening test result in the first month of life" (29.8%; 95%CI: 27.6-32.2) were considered unsatisfactory. Regional and social inequalities were identified, with worse performance for all the indicators in the North and Northeast regions of Brazil and in more vulnerable women, revealing the need for better organization and supply of services to reduce iniquities.

El objetivo de este estudio es estimar la utilización de los servicios de salud ambulatorios durante el posparto, así como verificar los factores demográficos, socioeconómicos y obstétricos, asociados a esta utilización. Estudio nacional de base hospitalaria, realizado en 2011-2012, con una entrevista a 23.894 mujeres. Se calcularon las estimaciones puntuales y los respectivos intervalos de confianza de ocho indicadores de utilización de servicios de salud con desempeño evaluado como "satisfactorio" (75%-100%); "parcial" (50%-74%) e "insatisfactorio" (< 50%). Se realizó una regresión logística múltiple para verificar la asociación entre las características de las mujeres y cada uno de los indicadores analizados. Cuatro indicadores -"búsqueda del servicio para consulta de revisión del parto" (73,9%; IC95%: 72,4-75,3), "búsqueda del servicio para consulta del recién nacido" (91,6%; IC95%: 90,6-92,5), "vacunación con BCG" (99%; IC95%: 98,7-99,2) y "vacunación contra hepatitis B" (96,8%; IC95%: 96,0-97,5) se consideraron satisfactorios. La "recogida del test de clasificación neonatal en la primera semana de vida" se consideró parcial (60,1%; IC95%: 57,6-62,6), mientras que "consulta de la mujer durante los primeros 15 días tras el parto" (37%; IC95%: 35,0-39,0), "consulta del recién nacido en los primeros siete días de vida" (21,8%; IC95%: 20,2-23,5) y "recepción del resultado de la clasificación neonatal durante el primer mes de vida" (29,8%; IC95%: 27,6-32,2) fueron considerados insatisfactorios. Las desigualdades regionales y sociales se identificaron con un peor desempeño de todos los indicadores en las regiones Norte y Nordeste, y en mujeres más vulnerables, apuntando la necesidad de una mejor organización y oferta de los servicios, con el fin de reducir de inequidades.

PREPARE: protocol for a stepped wedge trial to evaluate whether a risk stratification model can reduce preterm deliveries among women with suspected or confirmed preterm pre-eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of short and long-term morbidity for affected infants, including consequences of fetal growth restriction and iatrogenic prematurity. In Brazil, this is a special problem as PE accounts for 18% of preterm births (PTB). In the PREPARE (Prematurity REduction by Pre-eclampsia cARE) study, we will test a novel system of integrated care based on risk stratification and knowledge transfer, to safely reduce PTB. METHODS: This is a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial that will include women with suspected or confirmed PE between 20 + 0 and 36 + 6 gestational weeks. All pregnant women presenting with these findings at seven tertiary centres in geographically dispersed sites, throughout Brazil, will be considered eligible and evaluated in terms of risk stratification at admission. At randomly allocated time points, sites will transition to risk stratification performed according to sFlt-1/PlGF (Roche Diagnostics) measurement and fullPIERS score with both results will be revealed to care providers. The healthcare providers of women stratified as low risk for adverse outcomes (sFlt-1/PlGF ≤38 AND fullPIERS< 10% risk) will receive the recommendation to defer delivery. sFlt-1/PlGF will be repeated once and fullPIERS score twice a week. Rates of prematurity due to preeclampsia before and after the intervention will be compared. Additionally, providers will receive an active program of knowledge transfer about WHO recommendations for preeclampsia, including recommendations regarding antenatal corticosteroids for foetal benefits, antihypertensive therapy and magnesium sulphate for seizure prophylaxis. This study will have 90% power to detect a reduction in PTB associated with PE from a population estimate of 1.5 to 1.0%, representing a 33% risk reduction, and 80% power to detect a reduction from 2.0 to 1.5% (25% risk reduction). The necessary number of patients recruited to achieve these results is 750. Adverse events, serious adverse events, both anticipated and unanticipated will be recorded. DISCUSSION: The PREPARE intervention expects to reduce PTB and improve care of women with PE without significant adverse side effects. If successful, this novel pathway of care is designed for rapid translation to healthcare throughout Brazil and may be transferrable to other low and middle income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03073317.

[A firsthand description of childbirth's pathways into Brazilian health policies: interview with Maria do Carmo Leal and Marcos Dias]. / Os percursos do parto nas políticas de saúde no Brasil por suas testemunhas: entrevista com Maria do Carmo Leal e Marcos Dias.

This interview discusses the pathways that brought childbirth into Brazilian public policies. Maria do Carmo Leal and Marcos Dias are active participants in this journey, in academics as well as activism. In the interview, the participants reflect on the challenges to achieving change in the Brazilian health care model and highlight the importance of women's participation and their movements in reaching this goal.

A entrevista aborda os percursos que colocaram o parto na pauta das políticas públicas brasileiras. Maria do Carmo Leal e Marcos Dias são participantes ativos nesse percurso, tanto no campo acadêmico como no âmbito do ativismo. Na entrevista, os depoentes refletem sobre os desafios enfrentados para alcançar uma mudança no modelo assistencial brasileiro e destacam a importância da participação das mulheres e de seus movimentos no alcance desse objetivo.